<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Citizen Responds: JZ Knight Sets the Record Straight on the City of Yelm Water Issue in Public Ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jzknight.com/2009/07/a-citizen-responds-jz-knight-sets-the-record-straight-on-the-city-of-yelm-water-issue-in-public-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jzknight.com/2009/07/a-citizen-responds-jz-knight-sets-the-record-straight-on-the-city-of-yelm-water-issue-in-public-ad/</link>
	<description>www.JZKnight.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 05:54:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Wiltsie</title>
		<link>http://www.jzknight.com/2009/07/a-citizen-responds-jz-knight-sets-the-record-straight-on-the-city-of-yelm-water-issue-in-public-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Wiltsie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jzknight.com/?p=105#comment-22</guid>
		<description>This is exactly the point that I raised at the start of the Thurstion Highlands 
Development process.  The initial Aquifer test reports indicated that the aquifer would be drawn down 7 ft 2 miles away, suggesting that wells closer in could be drawn down significantly more.  The final aquifer drawdown study appears to confirm greater drawdown characteristics. 

JZ&#039;s contention is accurate and the MDNS is in error.  There will be major impacts.  The City of Yelm&#039;s migitation plan via the Thurston Highlands development is no longer confirmed, hence it can not be considered viable at this time and should be withdrawn as I commented in May 2009.  

Further, original agreements made with Thurston Highlands regarding transfer of the Golf Course water rights and development of a well field by Thurston Highlands have been cancelled eliminating a second aspect of the City Mitigation Planl, without a major commitment of funds by the City, which is not possible without a complete change of the present process via action by the Mayor and Council, including securing funding for the development of the Golf Course well field development.

E A Wiltsie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly the point that I raised at the start of the Thurstion Highlands<br />
Development process.  The initial Aquifer test reports indicated that the aquifer would be drawn down 7 ft 2 miles away, suggesting that wells closer in could be drawn down significantly more.  The final aquifer drawdown study appears to confirm greater drawdown characteristics. </p>
<p>JZ&#8217;s contention is accurate and the MDNS is in error.  There will be major impacts.  The City of Yelm&#8217;s migitation plan via the Thurston Highlands development is no longer confirmed, hence it can not be considered viable at this time and should be withdrawn as I commented in May 2009.  </p>
<p>Further, original agreements made with Thurston Highlands regarding transfer of the Golf Course water rights and development of a well field by Thurston Highlands have been cancelled eliminating a second aspect of the City Mitigation Planl, without a major commitment of funds by the City, which is not possible without a complete change of the present process via action by the Mayor and Council, including securing funding for the development of the Golf Course well field development.</p>
<p>E A Wiltsie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

